Odor shuts down South Hills Medical Building at Jefferson Regional Medical Center
The annex of the South Hills Medical Building at Jefferson Regional Medical Center reopened late Tuesday afternoon once the issue was resolved of a pungent odor that sickened several employees, forcing the facility to be evacuated.
Jefferson Regional spokeswoman Candy Williams said employees at the facility along Coal Valley Road reported the smell around 11 a.m. and emergency responders arrived around 11:30 a.m.
“Some medical office workers on the fifth floor of the annex experienced a pungent odor and exhibited signs of dizziness and nausea,” Williams said.
“Nine of them went to our emergency room and were being treated. As a result, the hospital evacuated that portion of the building,” she said.
An Allegheny County Hazmat team tested air quality, but Williams said they were unable to determine a cause for the odor.
“All nine of those workers have also been discharged from the emergency room,” she said.
Williams stressed that no portion of the hospital was endangered by the incident.
“Patients in the hospital were safe and not affected by this,” she said. “The (medical building) is mainly offices, and patients who had appointments in the afternoon are being asked to call their physicians to reschedule.”
The building is scheduled to be open as usual on Wednesday.
Tim Karan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1970, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.