ShareThis Page

West Mifflin Area preparing to file lawsuit against state

| Friday, Sept. 27, 2013, 3:16 a.m.

West Mifflin Area School District is preparing to file a lawsuit against the state Department of Education for what the school board deems unfair compensation for Duquesne students the district had to take on beginning in 2007 and inequality between the way public and charter schools receive funds.

The board voted on Thursday to authorize its solicitor to prepare the suit, on which the board is to vote again before filing.

State mandates dating back to 2007 first required the transfer of ninth- through 12th-grade students from Duquesne to West Mifflin Area and East Allegheny schools. Beginning in 2012-13, the law was reinterpreted to include seventh- and eighth-graders.

District officials said the root of the issue is the discrepancy between what the state pays the district in regard to special education students who attend public schools as opposed to charter schools and Title I federal funds that should be provided to Duquesne students now attending West Mifflin Area.

“When we accepted the Duquesne students, we've never been happy with the financial arrangement,” board president Phil Shar said. “If a Duquesne special ed student comes to West Mifflin, we get about $10,000 — maybe a little more. But if that same special ed student goes to a charter school, that school gets $24,000 or $25,000. To me, that isn't fair.”

Shar said the district has about 70 Duquesne students in special education programs.

“If you take that $24,000 or $25,000 and multiply that by 70 students, we've got a million dollars,” he said. “And that could be every year from now on.”

Shar said Title I federal funds that should be provided to Duquesne students attending West Mifflin Area are currently being given to the Duquesne City School District.

“We found out that if a Duquesne student goes to a charter school, his Title I money follows him,” Shar said. “But if he comes to West Mifflin, it doesn't follow him. We're just asking to be fully funded just like the charter schools.”

Inequality between public and charter school funding is a huge concern of Superintendent Daniel Castagna.

“If the same student can go to school one place and carry a dollar amount, that's the dollar amount they should carry no matter where they attend,” Castagna said. “The state makes up these rules and sets these dollar amounts and nobody can give us an explanation as to why it should be different 10 miles this way or 10 miles that way.”

Shar estimated that the worst-case scenario of a failed lawsuit would cost the district about $15,000-$20,000 in legal fees. But to him, it seems like a risk worth taking.

“We've been talking about this for a while now and I think it's the time to say, ‘Let's go see what happens,'” he said. “All we want is our fair share.”

The board voted 4-5 against hiring Jeffrey Smith as high school baseball coach. In August the board voted to open longtime coach Jeff Kuzma's position.

The vote was met with a smattering of applause from members of the audience. When one board member suggested that the job is still Kuzma's, Castagna said, “We currently don't have a baseball coach.”

Further action is expected to take place at an athletic committee meeting.

Tim Karan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1970, or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.