District may seek driver's dismissal
McKeesport Area School District officials are calling for an investigation and possible suspension of a Pennsylvania Coach Lines bus driver in response to an incident in which a kindergartner was left on a vehicle and woke up in the bus garage parking lot.
According to Trib Total Media news partner WPXI, a mother put her daughter on a bus in McKeesport on Friday around 8:50 a.m., then got a call from Pennsylvania Coach Lines stating her daughter was still there at 2:30 p.m.
The daughter reportedly was sleeping on the floor under her seat, and was found by another driver boarding the bus to pick up students in the afternoon.
“The employee handbook for PA Coach Lines reads, ‘Every driver is responsible for checking their bus after every school drop-off ... for students and damage on the bus. Any driver who leaves a student on the bus will be immediately terminated,'” according to a statement released by McKeesport Area spokesperson Kristen Giran.
“Anything less than perfection in the transportation of our children is unacceptable. Exiting a bus without accounting for every child after every run is inexcusable. The district stands with the family as it demands immediate accountability for this negligence,” the statement said.
Giran referred further questions to district Solicitor Gary Matta, who said officials requested the suspension of the driver pending a full investigation. Matta said there will be a meeting with bus line officials on Monday.
Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1965, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.