McKeesport apartment fire displaces 7 adults, 1 child
By Michael DiVittorio
Published: Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2013, 2:16 a.m.
Seven adults and one child were assisted with food and shelter by the American Red Cross after being displaced by an apartment fire in McKeesport.
City fire Chief Kevin Lust said no injuries were reported in connection with the blaze Monday at 2:45 a.m. at 918 Union St.
The fire is believed to have originated from a bathroom in one of the four apartments.
Lust said he could not confirm which apartment. The Allegheny County Fire Marshal is investigating.
Firefighters quickly put out the fire but residents were displaced because electricity had to be cut to the entire building, Lust explained.
Tia Como said she could smell smoke from her residence a couple buildings away from the apartment and went to check on her friends in that building.
“That's when I came out of the house and went over there,” she said. “We were all over there sitting on the wall. It was horrible. I guess they put everybody in the building in a hotel. We're buddies.”
Como said she also gave some of them clothing and a blanket.
A black-and-white cat belonging to people in the apartment could not go to the hotel. Como said she fed the cat and it has taken residence on the porch of a nearby abandoned home.
Emergency responders cleared the scene at 6:27 a.m.
Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1965, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- West Mifflin business joins forces with East Allegheny students
- Local Episcopal priest sentenced in child pornography case
- Prescription Drug Take Back Day to be observed locally
- Elizabeth council seeks $500,000 state gaming grant to aid flood recovery
- White Oak residents can sign up through borough police for county’s new registry
- North Versailles magisterial judge “retires” but remains on bench
- 2 South Allegheny students earn accolades for environmental awareness artwork
- West Jefferson board approves bids for multiple projects
- Mon Valley public works crews begin patchwork on pothole-filled roadways
- Liberty council renews police chief, borough secretary contracts
- Pleasant Hills chicken limit questioned