Liberty council addresses school bus stop complaint
A Liberty resident complained to borough council on Wednesday that speeding near a bus stop on Washington Boulevard before and after school poses a danger to children.
“Somebody needs to do something,” said Jeff Rhodes, who said he has seen drivers going as fast as 60 mph in a school zone close to the Glassport border. The speed limit is 15 mph.
“It's not being enforced,” he said.
Police Chief Luke Riley said his department has stepped up patrols in the area and recently issued 30 citations.
Riley said police will continue to keep an eye open for dangerous drivers, but the department doesn't have manpower to keep a cruiser stationed in the area all of the time.
Riley, a member of the South Allegheny school board, and George Gobel, solicitor for the borough and the school district, said Rhodes made similar claims at a school board meeting earlier in the evening.
Responding to Rhodes' claim that there is documentation of dangerous driving near the stop, Gobel advised him to present it to police.
Referring to the number of tickets that have been issued, Gobel said, “I don't know what more police can do.”
Council discussed adding a flashing sign to alert motorists that they are entering a school zone, but borough officials said PennDOT would have to place the sign because Washington Boulevard is a state road.
Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1966, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.