Steel Valley teachers share benefits of college-level courses
Steel Valley School District officials hailed the success of college level programs at the high school at a school board meeting this week.
For college-bound students, “It's an awesome opportunity,” calculus teacher Tim Vickers told board members on Tuesday.
Vickers is one of five high school teachers certified by the University of Pittsburgh to deliver college-level instruction to students.
In addition to calculus, students can earn college credits in French, communications and rhetoric, physics and probability and statistics.
The high school has been offering such programs for about 25 years. Students can earn 18 college credits before they graduate.
High school principal Bryan Macuga noted the $225 tuition fee for each course is about a 10th of what students would pay if they were taking the classes in college.
French teacher Toni Besh said there are other advantages to taking the higher level courses while in high school. The French class she teaches would be covered in a single semester in college; at the high school, she said, lessons are spread out during the entire school year.
Not all students enrolled in the upper-level courses pay tuition fees. School officials said those who do not pay cover the same material and are assessed identically but do not receive the college credits.
Physics teacher Ben Lander said 10 of the 22 students he has in his Advanced Placement physics course are earning credits from Pitt.
Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1966, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.