McKeesport mother still seeks closure for son's violent death
Caroline Spears still is trying to find closure from her son's violent death three years ago.
Garry Grigsby II was killed during a robbery near the intersection of Powderly and Grover streets in McKeesport on Oct. 26, 2010.
Police said he was shot in the chest when he and a woman were confronted by three men.
Family and friends gathered Saturday to spread a message of love with electronic candles along the sidewalk.
“It gives me peace,” Spears said. “But it doesn't give me closure.”
Grigsby, 28, left behind six children. He had been certified by the Everest Institute Paralegal program in 2007.
“He was kind-hearted. He loved everybody,” Spears said. “He was a family-type dude. He was young, but he wasn't violent or anything like that. He was an honor roll student. He was intelligent. He wasn't a bum out on the street. He had ambitions and was trying to help raise his kids. He was a good son.”
Grigsby was walking home from a Grover Street bar when he was killed. Spears said she is puzzled about the motive.
“If you give someone everything you got, why would you be shot?” she asked.
The family lived in Ohio before coming to McKeesport.
“I brought him back here thinking this is where I grew up and this is a wonderful place,” Spears said. “McKeesport used to be a really nice place. I graduated from school here, married here, everything here, and for somebody to just shoot him ....”
Spears said she was told that investigators had identified a suspect and that a house had been searched, but no arrests have been made.
Anyone with information should contact Allegheny County police at 412-473-1300 or McKeesport police at 412-675-5050. Callers can remain anonymous.
Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1965 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.