Smell of gas disrupts ex-Elizabeth school for 2nd straight day
Reports of gas odors brought emergency crews to the former Elizabeth Elementary School on Monday and Tuesday.
Photo by Patrick Cloonan | Daily News
A day care center and other tenants of the former Elizabeth Elementary School building were disrupted on two consecutive days this week because of gas odors.
“There's a strong smell of gas,” Elizabeth borough secretary Pam Sharp said at her office across the street late Tuesday morning.
Monday's problem was traced to a car leaking gas, authorities said, but Peoples Natural Gas crews were called to fix the problem on Tuesday.
“We found a very small gas leak in the boiler room,” Peoples spokesman Barry Kukovich said. “It was a 2-inch fitting where the school's gas pipe connected to the boiler.”
Firefighters from Elizabeth and Glassport were called to block off Third Avenue during Tuesday's emergency, which began around 11:46 a.m. and was resolved enough that Glassport firefighters returned to their station within 45 minutes.
“Three adults are being evaluated with headaches,” Pennsylvania 1 Call's pa1call.net emailed shortly after noon. Pennsylvania 1 Call handles emergencies that may involve underground utility lines.
“There is no evacuation at this time,” the email said.
Monday,'s evacuation sent youngsters and teachers to the borough office.
Police thought it might have been from a vehicle that had a pool of liquid under it, borough emergency personnel said. The car was towed away.
On Tuesday a plumber was called to fix the leak. Kukovich anticipated the utility turning the gas back on late in the afternoon.
“The day care center was not closed,” Kukovich said.
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-916, ext. 1967, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.