Murder-suicide suspected in N. Versailles deaths
A couple was found dead in their North Versailles Township home on Tuesday morning, and police are investigating it as a murder and suicide.
Police were called to the home of Mark and Erin Hoey when township emergency dispatchers received a call around 8:15 a.m. that Mark Hoey had failed to report to work.
Neighbors said Mark Hoey, 48, worked in the printing industry. Erin Hoey, 45, was a florist.
According to police Chief Vince DiCenzo, police went to the home in the 100 block of Thomas Avenue and found the bodies. Investigators at the scene would not discuss the cause of death for either nor indicate who was the victim.
“It's still under investigation,” DiCenzo said.
Allegheny County Medical Examiner's office confirmed the couple's identity.
The cause and manner of death will be dtermined by autopsies.
Neighbors described the couple as friendly and said they often worked in their yard.
“They were very nice people,” said Jacky Orrick, who lives across the street. Orrick said that, when she and her husband moved into their home, “Mark was the first one to come over and welcome us to the neighborhood.”
Orrick described the couple as “just your average friendly neighbors.”
Orrick said she had heard the couple argue on a few occasions but didn't think it was anything out of the ordinary.
“My husband and I argue, too,” she said.
Orrick said the couple seemed to be keeping to themselves recently, but she said news of their deaths is shocking.
“You just don't expect it,” she said.
Neighbors said Erin Hoey has an adult daughter who did not live with the couple.
Authorities safely removed the Hoey's dog from the house, neighbors said.
Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161 ext. 1966, or email@example.com.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.