ShareThis Page

Jury selection in Konias trial begins

| Thursday, Nov. 7, 2013, 2:41 a.m.

Jury selection got under way on Wednesday for a case involving a Dravosburg man accused of shooting his co-worker in the head during a $2.3 million heist from an armored truck last year.

Opening arguments in the jury trial of Kenneth John Konias Jr., 24, are expected to begin on Tuesday.

Konias allegedly shot his Garda Cash Logistics co-worker Michael R. Haines, 31, of East McKeesport on Feb. 28, 2012, while they were making their rounds for the company.

Haines was found alone inside the truck slumped against a side door with a bullet wound to the back of his head. The truck was parked under the 31st Street Bridge in Pittsburgh. Konias is alleged to have left the truck there and gone back to get his own vehicle a few blocks away.

Konias fled the area and was arrested two months later in Pompano Beach, Fla.

While in Florida, Konias reportedly spent some of the stolen money on prostitutes and was trying to obtain false identification with help from a cab driver so he could escape to Haiti.

At the end of the day on Wednesday, defense attorney Charles LoPresti said he and prosecutors had picked two jurors.

Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1966, or eslagle@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.