McKeesport Area examines harassment policies
McKeesport Area school board may take final action next week on updated policies dealing with unlawful harassment.
Items discussed at the board's workshop on Wednesday include policies on unlawful harassment and unlawful sexual harassment of students and employees.
Superintendent Rula S. Skezas said the policies were recommended by the Pennsylvania School Boards Association and approved by the U.S. Office of Civil Rights.
The agenda for next Wednesday at 7:30 p.m. is a short one, with two budget items.
The board will decide whether to accept proposals from Ideal Integrations at $49,691.73 for the online network and wireless project at the new Twin Rivers primary-intermediate complex; and Garvin, Boward and Beitko at no more than $50,000 for geotechnical engineering consulting services for the Founders' Hall Sixth Grade Academy.
Speaking of the budget, business manager David Seropian said the district has a 2.6 percent limit for tax increases it could approve in 2014-15 without having to seek voter approval.
That's the state's Act 1 limit for the district.
If the board acts next month to stay within that limit, it would hold any hike in real estate taxes to 0.4 mills, from 15.22 to 15.62.
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1967, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.