Merchant Marine president addresses flagpole concerns at council meeting
Elizabeth borough officials welcomed the president of the local American Merchant Marine Veterans chapter to Tuesday's council meeting.
“We hold you and your organization in very high regard,” council president Monica Glowinski told Gerald Driscoll, president of the Merchant Marine Veterans' Mon Valley chapter.
“We had a long and beneficial relationship with Elizabeth borough,” Driscoll, of Forward Township, told council. “Our members are proud to march in the Veterans Day parade in Elizabeth.”
Driscoll came to smooth over differences prompted by a former member of that chapter, without ever mentioning Mike Kemple's name.
“He had nothing to do with us,” Driscoll said. “(He) has not been (a member) for some time.”
Kemple, an Elizabeth Township resident, led efforts to get a Merchant Marine flagpole erected at the borough's honor roll, but antagonized residents and officials in the process.
Driscoll was following up on last month's appearance by Wendy Buza, whose fundraising efforts led to the honor roll near the Elizabeth Bridge.
She took aim at Kemple's activity and urged borough officials to have future dealings about the Merchant Marine flagpole with Driscoll.
Kemple could not be reached for comment at presstime.
In other borough matters, Councilman Larry Duvall reported that $4,000 has been donated so far for the summer concert series on Plum Street.
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1967, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.