Forward budget passes unanimously
In a brief New Year's Eve session, Forward Township's board of supervisors unanimously approved a $1,500,598 budget for 2014.
The budget holds the line on real estate taxes at 2.05 mills, which will provide a large portion of $1,114,337 in anticipated general government revenues.
The township anticipates $169,000 in miscellaneous revenues, $144,575 from charges for services offered, $59,110 from license and permit fees, $11,600 from fines and forfeitures and $1,976 in interest.
The largest portion of the Forward budget, $592,731, will go toward police operations.
Other anticipated expenditures include $376,330 for highways, roads and streets; $309,080 for miscellaneous costs; $160,607 for general government operations; $60,300 for other aspects of public safety; and $1,550 for recreation.
The budget was available for public review at the municipal building since Dec. 11.
The board concluded its regular Dec. 9 meeting and approved an amended seismic testing ordinance that was on the agenda but not acted on pending a review by affected township residents.
Solicitor Matthew Racunas said there were few substantial changes from an ordinance passed earlier in 2013. It will regulate activity by EQT and its partner Geokinetics USA Inc. as they try to map out where gas fields are found in the township.
Supervisors will reorganize at a special meeting on Monday at 7 p.m.
There are no changes in the board's makeup with supervisor Dave Magiske winning re-election in November and board chairman Thomas DeRosa and supervisor Ronald J. Skrinjorich continuing their terms.
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161 ext. 1967 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.