Elizabeth council approves budget
On Tuesday afternoon Elizabeth council needed just one minute to cap the old year by passing a $760,312 budget for the new.
Council president Monica Glowinski was joined by colleagues Larry Duvall, V. Ann Malady, Robin Miller and Robin Payne-Main for a 5-0 vote.
Councilors Paul Shaner and Paula Stevens were absent.
The largest category for expenditures is $300,731 for public safety, including $78,000 for full-time police officers and $75,000 for part-timers.
After that comes public works at $82,473, while a $75,000 tax anticipation loan is included in a $82,245 category along with the $6,245 lease of a public works vehicle and $1,000 in interest on the loan.
Office expenditures are included in a $62,693 category and other expenses are divided among 10 other categories.
Council previously voted to hold taxes at 8 mills in 2014 but a scheduling glitch forced borough officials to schedule a special budget meeting on New Year's Eve.
The budget anticipates $337,000 in real estate tax revenue, $296,000 in new taxes and $41,000 in payments from delinquent taxpayers.
It also anticipates $123,750 in other taxes, $20,650 in fees, $14,800 in fines, $3,800 in interest and rental fees and $169,412 from other sources.
Those sources include the borough of West Elizabeth, which will pay Elizabeth $56,870 for police services and $500 for rock salt.
For Duvall, it was his last meeting before his term ends. Malady will be sworn in as mayor at the reorganization meeting on Monday at 7 p.m.
Miller will return for a new term while Chad Rager and Devie J. Rollison are sworn in among the newest members of council. Malady also was elected to a new term on council but will yield that seat.
Patrick Cloonan is a staff wrtier for Trib Total Media. He can be reached be reached at 412-664-9161 ext. 1967 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.