Alleged Versailles bank robber caught
An Export woman accused of robbing a PNC Bank in Versailles is in Allegheny County Jail.
Sarah D. Vercauteren, 25, is being held on $20,000 bond for a robbery that occurred Tuesday at about 2:30 p.m. in the Olympia Shopping Center.
Vercauteren, who reportedly left her 2-year-old child unattended in the car, allegedly attempted to rob a nearby Subway restaurant as well.
She is charged with robbery, criminal attempt, endangering the welfare of children and two counts of reckless endangerment of another person.
Versailles police Chief Charles Roka said Vercauteren passed a note to attendants at both businesses stating she had a gun and wanted their money.
Roka said the suspect went to the bank first and obtained an envelope, then went to the Subway. When her attempt failed, she returned to the bank, gave an employee the note and received less than $1,000, the chief said.
One of the victims gave police a description and Vercauteren's vehicle was stopped by McKeesport police along Evans Street in the city.
Roka said his department is appreciative of McKeesport for its rapid apprehension of the suspect. He said Vercauteren was in custody within about 10 minutes.
Roka said Vercauteren never showed a gun at either business and no weapon was recovered.
“She left the child in the car in sub-zero weather while she went in those places,” the chief said.
He said the child was turned over to Vercauteren's family, and Allegheny County Office of Children, Youth and Families was notified.
Vercauteren's preliminary hearing before Magisterial District Judge Thomas Miller is scheduled for Jan. 13.
Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1966, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.