None injured when bricks fall from Versailles office building
Freezing and thawing is believed to be the cause of a partial collapse of a building in Versailles.
Photo by Michael DiVittorio | Daily News
A Versailles doctor is making house calls because the building in which his office is located partially collapsed on Thursday.
Dr. Rudolph Antoncic III said no one was injured when bricks fell from the front facade at 5301 Walnut St. around 1 p.m.
Antoncic said he, his wife and three patients were in his office at the time.
“I thought initially that someone had crashed into the building,” Antoncic said.
Authorities believe weather may have been the cause. Police, firefighters and EMS personnel responded.
Antoncic said the building's construction dates to before the Civil War. He believes water got into the mortar, flash froze, then thawed and pushed out the bricks.
“It could have really pummeled somebody,” Antoncic said.
Caution tape was placed around the building's perimeter, and the intersection of Walnut and Linden streets was closed. Duquesne Light has cut power to the building.
Antoncic said patients' medical records are electronic and can be accessed, and he has enough tools to treat patients outside the office.
“We can handle it,” he said. “I don't have all my eggs in one basket.”
Kisan Productions owns the building. It is uncertain when it will be restored.
“I think we'll recover quickly,” Antoncic said.
Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161 ext. 1965, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.