Accident hospitalizes worker in Duquesne
An accident at DuraBond's Duquesne facility Monday morning sent a McKeesport man to the hospital, where he is listed in good condition.
Marc Kovach, 27, sustained injuries to his trunk when he was struck by falling pipe around 8 a.m.
Kovach's family said he sustained three broken ribs, an injury to his left eye, and his arm was temporarily immobilized.
“He's going to be all right, but he's in a lot of pain,” his brother Randy Kovach of McKeesport said.
A UPMC spokesperson confirmed Marc Kovach is in good condition. Family said he is expected to remain hospitalized for a few days for observation and additional tests.
“They were loading pipe, and there was one that Marc put into place,” Randy Kovach said. “He turned and it broke free. Three of the pipes fell on him.”
McKeesport Ambulance Rescue Service officials, who transported Marc Kovach to the hospital from the facility in the Regional Industrial Development Corp. of Southwestern Pennsylvania's Riverplace City Center of Duquesne, said there are conflicting reports about what happened. It was unclear what part of Kovach's body the pipe struck.
Randy Kovach said his brother doesn't remember much because he regained consciousness in the ambulance.
Family confirmed Marc Kovach is an employee of the McKeesport-based temporary employment agency Labor Ready. He has found steady work with DuraBond for nearly two years.
Patrick Cloonan contributed to this story. Jennifer R. Vertullo is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-664-9161 ext. 1956, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.