McKeesport man arrested for heroin
A McKeesport man is awaiting a preliminary hearing on narcotics charges because police uncovered 140 stamp bags of suspected heroin on his property.
David A. Anderson Jr., 36, is charged with possession with intent to deliver, possession of a controlled substance, possession of drug paraphernalia, and possession of a small amount of marijuana.
McKeesport police and representatives of the Allegheny County District Attorney's Narcotics Enforcement Team, executed a search warrant on Friday at approximately 8:45 p.m. at Anderson's Lamont Street residence.
McKeesport Capt. of Detectives Tim Hanna said investigations such as this help to curb drug activity because it takes mid-level drug dealers out of the loop.
“McKeesport Police Department works closely with DANET agents in all of its drug investigations,” Hanna said. “This investigation was funded by the District Attorney's office, and that allows us to get investigations done more efficiently than we would otherwise. They have an active role in what we do here.”
During Friday's search, Anderson led detectives to two containers where the 140 stamp bags were located. Police confiscated $795 in cash, two cell phones and a plastic bag containing a small amount of suspected marijuana.
Anderson was transported to Allegheny County Jail and released on bond. His preliminary hearing is scheduled for Jan. 27 at 1 p.m. before Magisterial District Judge Eugene Riazzi.
Jennifer R. Vertullo is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-664-9161 ext. 1956, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.