Cause of N. Versailles fire a mystery
Investigators are trying to determine what started a fire in an unoccupied house in North Versailles Township late Monday morning.
Damage to the single-story brick structure along East Street was “pretty significant,” Fire Department of North Versailles Chief Mike Volpe said.
“The whole first floor collapsed down in on it,” the chief said.
No one was hurt in the blaze, which authorities said may have started in the basement of the home.
“Right now the (Allegheny County) fire marshal is looking into it,” Volpe said.
The fire was reported at about 10:30 a.m. and it took crews about 90 minutes to bring it under control.
Volpe said firefighters used a defensive approach because the house was unoccupied.
A resident who lives across the street said that house and two others along the street have been unoccupied for years. The neighbor said someone periodically would look in on the property.
Volpe said the house wasn't empty but it wasn't clear how long it had been since someone had lived there.
It was difficult to see the house from the street because of overgrown trees. Snow and cold temperatures provided an added challenge for fire crews.
North Huntingdon EMS Rescue set up a warming tent at the fire scene and a Port Authority bus was brought in to provide a warming place for first responders.
In addition to township departments, firefighters from North Braddock, Swissvale, Wilmerding, East McKeesport, Turtle Creek, Monroeville, Pitcairn and Glassport responded.
Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161 ext. 1966, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.