ShareThis Page

Clairton educators approve use of grounds for garden project

| Thursday, Feb. 27, 2014, 7:25 a.m.

A section of Clairton Education Center grounds will be set aside for students to maintain a garden for science enrichment.

In a 7-0 vote on Wednesday with directors Roger Tachoir and Robert Harrigan absent, the school board approved use of an area between the fence and gazebo along Waddell Avenue.

The CASTLE after-school program, open to middle school students, will take on a Sense of Place learning program in partnership with Grow Pittsburgh as part of an environmental science and ecology curriculum.

“It will help students plan and prepare, because they'll be developing their own garden,” school board president Richard Livingston said. “It helps their mathematics skills, and they get to watch the stages of their plan come through.”

Livingston said the garden will help to provide healthy food for families, as well.

“Our students will be growing vegetables that they can enjoy in everyday meals,” Livingston said.

The garden project is planned for a spring start, and it will be maintained by parents and community volunteers during the summer. Livingston said the district plans to reach out to Clairton's Unity Committee, which maintains a garden along St. Clair Avenue.

Jennifer R. Vertullo is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-664-9161 ext. 1956, or jvertullo@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.