3 teens arrested in White Oak robbery
An 18-year-old McKeesport resident is in Allegheny County Jail in lieu of $100,000 bond on charges that he robbed a White Oak teenager last weekend at gunpoint.
White Oak police Chief Lou Bender said Ryan J. Marshall Jr. was arraigned on Friday morning before Magisterial District Judge Thomas G. Miller Jr. on felony counts of robbery, unlawful constraint and conspiracy and misdemeanor counts of simple assault and terroristic threats.
Bender said two juvenile males, a 16-year-old from McKeesport and a 17-year-old from North Versailles Township, were charged as well in the Feb. 22 holdup of a 16-year-old male headed home from a convenience store around 8:30 p.m.
“He was threatened with what he believed to be a pistol,” Bender said of the youth accosted along Vermont Avenue. The victim was not injured.
“White Oak and McKeesport police arrested Marshall on (Thursday) at his home on Soles Street,” Bender said. The 16-year-old was charged with robbery, criminal conspiracy, unlawful restraint, simple assault and terroristic threats, while the 17-year-old was charged with criminal conspiracy and possession of a controlled substance.
The two younger suspects were placed in Shuman Juvenile Detention Center and their cases will be processed through Juvenile Court.
A preliminary hearing is scheduled for Marshall on March 17 at 1:30 p.m. in Miller's courtroom.
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1967, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.