Hearing postponed in Versailles sex assault
A preliminary hearing for a Versailles bar owner charged with rape has been continued for three weeks.
The bond holding Todd A. Arthrell, 42, of Versailles was reduced from $500,000 straight cash to what effectively is a $2,000 bond, or 10 percent of $20,000.
Arthrell remained in Allegheny County Jail, according to court records, awaiting a hearing before Magisterial District Judge Thomas G. Miller Jr. in White Oak.
It had been scheduled for Monday, but now will be March 31 at 1:30 p.m.
Arthrell was arrested on Feb. 19 by county police on two counts each of rape, sexual assault and involuntary deviate sexual intercourse — all felonies — and a misdemeanor count of indecent assault.
In an affidavit, county police said a 26-year-old woman was assaulted by Arthrell at his The Bridge Tap House & Grille along the 5200 block of Walnut Street in Versailles after closing time on Feb. 19.
The woman told county detectives she agreed to Arthrell's request to meet him, but not for sexual activity.
Arthrell allegedly plied her with liquor then forced her to have oral sex and intercourse.
Police said the woman was treated at UPMC McKeesport.
The affidavit quoted Arthrell as refusing to meet the detectives for an interview, saying, “go ahead and put charges on me because I didn't do anything.”
Court authorities said the continuance and reduced bond were requested by defense attorney William Difenderfer, who could not be reached for comment at presstime.
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161 ext. 1967, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.