Suspended West Jefferson Hills teacher, girlfriend waive drug charges to court
A suspended West Jefferson Hills School District teacher and his girlfriend charged with running a marijuana growing operation in their home waived all charges to Allegheny County Court on Wednesday.
Scott Houck, 41, of South Park Township was suspended without pay from his position as an industrial arts teacher at Thomas Jefferson High School after the drug allegations came to light in January.
According to court documents, state and South Park Township police served a search warrant at the Sebolt Road home that Houck shared with his 23-year-old girlfriend, Taylor Bottone.
Police reportedly found several marijuana plants growing in a room concealed by a hidden door, along with two 5-ounce bags of marijuana, heating lamps, fertilizer, irrigation pumps and other items used to grow the plants.
Authorities said there's no indication Houck committed any crimes at the school or sold drugs to students.
Houck's defense attorney, Charles LoPresti, said he looks forward to taking the case to the next level.
“This is a very ordinary procedure,” he said. “We had some discussions with the police officers and we hope to discuss this further with the district attorney's office.”
Houck and Bottone are charged with conspiracy, possession with intent to deliver and possession of a controlled substance, marijuana and drug paraphernalia.
They will have a formal arraignment at the Allegheny County Courthouse at 11 a.m. on May 15.
Tim Karan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1970, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.