ShareThis Page

Steel Valley considers school uniforms in dress code update

| Tuesday, April 8, 2014, 7:23 a.m.

Steel Valley School District's dress code policy is on the drawing board.

School directors and administrators met Monday in a high school conference room to discuss concepts for a new dress code or uniform policy. It was the first formal meeting dedicated to the topic.

The district's current policy, which has not been revised since 2002, indicates it will not interfere with the rights of students or their parents to make decisions regarding appearance unless it presents a hazard to health or safety, disrupts the educational process, causes excessive damage to school property or prevents the student from achieving.

School directors said they have the educational process in mind as they consider drafting a new policy.

“It's a better educational process,” school director Tom Olson said. “There's less stress, less competition and less bullying.”

Vice president Colette Youngblood said there are economic and educational benefits to the dress code. Families can find relatively cheap school clothes in basic styles rather than using school as a runway for the latest expensive trends.

“Instead of asking your girlfriends what you're wearing to school tomorrow, you can ask them what homework you have for tomorrow,” Youngblood said.

“Our job is to educate children, not to help them make a fashion statement,” school director Don Bajus agreed.

Diana Borges, director of pupil personnel, special services and elementary education, said data is available to support the notion that students perform better when dressed better.

“You perform how you look,” Superintendent Edward Wehrer said, noting that a uniform dress code may inspire achievement based on school pride.

“That sense of team — that sense of pride in the school district — would be heightened,” he said.

Ed Colebank, director of academics, information and technology, said he is in favor of dress code revisions for the educational benefit, but wants the board to be aware of potential security issues that could arise with students wearing clothing that is too similar.

“If they are all wearing the same color, it's hard to pick out kids on camera,” Colebank said. Cameras may need to be added or repositioned if the board chooses a policy that allows for limited color selections, he explained.

Positive aspects associated with security include being able to identify Steel Valley students in school or on field trips.

“It helps identify intruders in the school, which is interesting,” school director Sue Ballas said.

The district heard from a handful of parents who support the idea of dress code revisions but had questions about its enforcement.

Anitra and Emmanuel Hughes, parents of three district students and one graduate, said students should be held to a professional standard of dress because school is preparing them for the real world.

“If we are teaching them, we have to guide them,” Emmanuel Hughes said, asking if educators will be held to a similar standard in the policy. “If we want them to look a certain way, we have to look that way, too.”

Those who attended were happy to share their opinions, but they wanted more families to be involved in the process. While the meeting was advertised publicly, parents asked that the next discussion be promoted via the district's telephone alert system as a public hearing.

District officials acknowledged they will need student input as well, because student morale could take a hit if they feel left out of the process.

The next steps in developing a new policy will be a student survey and additional public meetings, including a workshop in which uniform companies and retailers will be invited to display clothing.

Jennifer R. Vertullo is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1956, or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.