Munhall council hires accounting firm to perform overdue audits
Munhall officials have chosen an accounting firm to perform long overdue audits for 2011 and 2012 along with the upcoming report for 2013.
Council unanimously approved the hire of Mark C. Turnley, CPA, at a flat rate of $6,500 per audit after opening and reviewing two other bids during a meeting Wednesday.
Former borough manager Matt Galla — who was released from jail earlier in the day on charges of allegedly embezzling $230,000 from taxpayers — allegedly lied about completing the 2011 and 2012 audits, according to a criminal complaint filed by a detective with the Allegheny County District Attorney's Office. Those missing audits cost the borough more than $354,000 in RAD money.
Castle Shannon-based Hosack Specht Muetzel & Wood completed the last known borough audit in 2010, and although councilors expressed a desire to remain with the firm due to its prior knowledge of Munhall's situation, the company's proposed rates were too high.
“They estimated their fees to range between $20,000 and $25,000 per year,” said interim borough manager Harry Faulk. “And the second proposal from RC Holsinger Associates Inc. was $9,200 for the 2011 audit, $9,300 for the 2012 audit and $9,300 for 2013.”
Faulk said the lowest bid from Turnley included a client list consisting of two cities, 15 boroughs, 15 townships and four councils of governments.
Council president Dan Lloyd said regardless of the auditor, the final results should be the same.
“We know that with what's happened, what's transpired, that we're going to get a qualified report no matter who does the audit, whether you pay $25,000 or $6,500,” he said. “I spoke to Mr. Turnley and I also spoke to a couple other auditing firms that said his work is good and on time. My feeling is to take the lowest responsible bidder.”
The borough now has until May 31 to complete the audits or risk losing further contributions from the county.
Tim Karan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.