ShareThis Page

Duquesne police make drug arrest

| Wednesday, April 16, 2014, 3:41 a.m.

Police found something up the sleeve — or more accurately, the pants leg — of a Duquesne man during a traffic stop Monday.

Police Chief Richard Adams said an officer noticed a large plastic bag sticking out from the pants Jamie Demery, 28, was wearing.

“There were two bags inside that bag,” Adams said. “One had 500 packets of (suspected) heroin, the other 2,000 packets.”

The suspected drug would have a street value of $10 per packet or $25,000, the police chief said.

Demery was charged with felony counts of possession of heroin and possession with intent to deliver, as well as a misdemeanor count of prohibited acts.

Police stopped the car in which Demery was a passenger along the 400 block of Hamilton Avenue around 7 p.m. Adams said the windows of the vehicle were tinted and so was a cover over the license plate, obscuring the number.

Officers found Demery and the driver had suspended licenses.

The driver was not charged, but Demery was arraigned early Tuesday before Magisterial District Judge Richard H. Zoller and released on his own recognizance pending a Tuesday hearing at 8:30 a.m. before Magisterial District Judge Scott H. Schricker in Turtle Creek.

Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1967, or pcloonan@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.