East Allegheny counselors receive national recognition
East Allegheny High School's guidance department has received national recognition.
“It was a pretty extensive process,” guidance counselor Emilia Peiffer said, holding a 2-inch thick binder documenting how her school became a “Recognized ASCA Model Program” or RAMP, as designated by the American School Counselor Association.
“(ASCA) believes that the implementation of comprehensive counseling programs in all schools across the nation is a vital step in the transformation of our education system,” association assistant director Jill Cook wrote in a letter announcing East Allegheny's achievement.
Peiffer said East Allegheny scored 55.67 out of a possible 60 on the American School Counselor Association's testing process.
School officials said East Allegheny is one of more than 400 districts that have received Recognized ASCA Model Program recognition since that program's inception in 2004. That includes 11 schools in Pennsylvania including Gateway, Blackhawk and Quaker Valley schools in the Pittsburgh area, Peiffer said.
While Peiffer has been a school counselor for 19 years, she had to go out and learn about the model program. “It took several trainings,” she said.
East Allegheny will have that model program designation through June 2017 and would have to apply by October 2016 for an extension.
Peiffer's achievement will be acknowledged at a recognition dinner on July 1 in Orlando, Fla., as part of the American School Counselor Association national conference.
On the same day, the guidance counselor will get a promotion within the Pennsylvania School Counselors Association, from president-elect to president for the 2014-15 school year.
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1967, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.