Crews fill Duquesne sinkhole
Duquesne public works crew members Bill Margita and Allan Chiesi level off gravel that was poured into a sinkhole at the intersection of Mehaffey and Hinnerman streets on Friday.
Photo by Jennifer R. Vertullo | Daily News
State and city crews filled a sinkhole along Mehaffey Street in Duquesne on Thursday.
The hole, measuring approximately 10 feet wide and 8 feet deep, surfaced last Friday as a small opening that grew overnight, prompting crews to close the road near Hinnerman Street on Saturday.
A state Department of Environmental Protection inspector for the Bureau of Abandoned Mine Reclamation examined the area on Tuesday.
“We've seen holes up here before,” public works employee Allan Chiesi said. “We had one in a yard that was 20 feet deep a few years ago and one in a driveway before I was here.”
Most of the homes in that section of the city's Third Ward were built in the 1920s, and prior to that development, the land was mined for coal.
Crews said Thursday's filling job was relatively simple.
“(The state) figured it was safe to shoot the gravel right from the truck into the hole because the weight of the truck was far enough from the hole itself,” Duquesne crew member Bill Margita said.
More than 60 tons of crushed No. 1A gravel were delivered — most going into the sinkhole and a small supply left for city crews to add after the load settles.
One lane of Mehaffey Street was opened after the gravel was poured. Crews said it will be at least one week before it settles enough for paving.
Jennifer R. Vertullo is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1956, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.