Liberty council renews police chief, borough secretary contracts
Liberty council renewed the contracts of two borough employees at a regular meeting on Monday.
Council renewed contracts for police Chief Luke Riley and borough secretary Debra Helderlein through June of next year.
Both renewals are retroactive. Riley's contract had expired in November and Helderlein had been working without a contract since March 2013, according to borough Solicitor George Gobel.
The renewed contacts are shorter — previously the chief and secretary had been awarded five-year employment contracts — but they are otherwise the same, according to borough officials.
Gobel said the borough was following a path other municipalities have taken in reducing the contract period of its employees.
“I think contracts generally are shorter in government today,” he said.
Council member Jennifer Riley-McClelland, who is Riley's daughter, abstained from voting on the measure related to her father's contract. Larry Sikorski also abstained on the vote, saying he'd missed a meeting in which the extensions were discussed.
In other business, council voted to make part-time borough laborer Tim Sloss the part-time director of the public works department.
Sloss, who has been working a total of 30 hours a week as a laborer, now will spend 10 of those hours overseeing the department at a rate of $13 per hour. As a laborer, Sloss earns $9.65 per hour.
Mayor Jane Weigand reminds residents they will be ticketed if they park too close to fire hydrants.
Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1966, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.