Light voter turnout predicted despite governor's race
Despite a four-way contest for the nomination for governor, the turnout for Tuesday's primary may be little different in heavily Democratic Allegheny County than the last time statewide issues took center stage.
County Elections Division manager Mark Wolosik predicted a 30 percent turnout for Democrats on Tuesday, while 20 percent of Republicans are expected at the polls.
“In 2010 the turnout was about 28 percent for both primary and general election,” Wolosik said.
Westmoreland County does not have similar projections.
Turnout may be up for both parties from last year in Allegheny voting.
“Last year Republican turnout was 16.86 percent and Democratic turnout 23.2 percent for the primaries,” Wolosik said. The 2013 voting mainly was for municipal and school offices.
Many in Allegheny County will have a Congressional contest in the Democratic primary, as 14th District U.S. Rep. Mike Doyle of Forest Hills takes on a rematch with the Rev. Janis C. Brooks of North Versailles Township.
Meanwhile, York businessman Tom Wolf, U.S. Rep. Allyson Schwartz from Philadelphia, state Treasurer Rob McCord and former state environmental protection secretary Kate McGinty square off for the right to take on incumbent Republican Gov. Tom Corbett.
Corbett is unopposed after the state Supreme Court removed Montgomery County conservative activist Robert Guzzardi from the ballot.
Wolf and McCord included the Pittsburgh area in last-minute campaigning, with Wolf rallying on Friday night at the Blue Top Pavilion in McKeesport's Renziehausen Park.
McCord planned a Saturday bus caravan through Pittsburgh and Harrisburg.
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1967.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.