Traffic stop in Dravosburg leads to drug arrest
A traffic stop by police in Dravosburg resulted in an arrest and the recovery of 23 packets of suspected heroin.
Dijuan Bray, 20, of McKeesport was arrested about 10:30 p.m. on Thursday in the area of the tunnel on Curry Hollow Road and charged for possession of heroin, possession of a small amount of marijuana and possession with intent to deliver.
Bray — who was allegedly in possession of heroin, marijuana, two cellphones and $1,490 in cash — was a passenger in a gold Chevy Malibu that police had stopped.
Police said detectives initiated the stop when they saw the car's headlights turn off as it entered the tunnel.
Police said the driver, McKeesport resident Douglas Coburn, 18, did not have a license. He and others in the car were asked to exit as police prepared to have the vehicle towed.
It was during a patdown of the car's occupants that police found the drugs and other items on Bray.
McKeesport police Lt. Chris Halaszynski said the arrest was the result of “detectives doing good work, acting when they see something out of the norm. Their awareness led to a stop that took more narcotics off the street.”
Police are citing Coburn for driving without a license and driving without headlights.
Bray is scheduled to have a preliminary hearing before West Mifflin Magisterial District Judge Richard D. Olasz Jr. on Thursday.
Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1966, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.