Police arrest McKeesport man for handgun possession
McKeesport police working a special anti-drug detail arrested a city man who was allegedly in possession of a handgun he wasn't permitted to carry.
Davon Wyatt, 27, of McKeesport is accused of fleeing from police when officers approached him and a group of other men who were in the 600 block of Sixth Avenue shortly before 11 p.m. on Tuesday.
The officers were on an anti-drug patrol detail funded by the Allegheny County District Attorney's Narcotics Enforcement Team.
“One of the males started to walk away and grabbed his waist band,” said McKeesport police Capt. Tim Hanna. “He then started to run towards McKeesport Mills” housing complex.
Hanna said Wyatt continued to hold his waistband during the chase until he allegedly removed a silver .45-caliber Ruger semiautomatic pistol from his waistband and tossed it over a fence. Police said the gun was loaded with a bullet in the chamber.
Police apprehended Wyatt shortly thereafter then retrieved the handgun.
Wyatt was arraigned on charges of carrying a firearm without a license, persons not to possess a firearm and disorderly conduct before Magisterial District Judge Eugene Riazzi in McKeesport on Wednesday. He is being held on $10,000 bail in Allegheny County Jail. His preliminary hearing is scheduled for June 2.
Hanna said the arrest underscores the value of the DANET program.
“The manpower (for added drug patrols) is paid for by the district attorney's office. We wouldn't be able to do these things if it wasn't them,” Hanna said. “It's nice when these details pay off with arrests.”
Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.