Dravosburg students request allowing youth to form council
Dravosburg children are interested in forming a youth council that could increase community involvement in government.
Harlie McKelvey, 15; Mila Hoover, 12; McKelvey Beerman, 12; Keiara Beerman, 9; Ricky Beerman, 8; and Nicky Beerman, 5, approached council on Tuesday with a prepared speech that outlined their requests.
“We would like to form a kid council,” Harlie said. “In this formational group of children, we will discuss topics to better our town of Dravosburg.”
Each reading a small portion of the speech, the children said they are community members who would like an opportunity to share their opinions.
“We value your opinions, but we think we can add to them with our creative and inventive minds,” Harlie said.
The children asked council to take their request seriously, noting they've put a lot of time and thought into the idea.
“We will probably discuss it in our next work session,” council president Jay McKelvey told kids once the meeting closed. “I think it's a great idea. We need younger people to be involved. They may get their foot in the door and become something bigger.”
Solicitor George Gobel explained that the youth council would have no legal authority, but they could serve as a recommending body to share community children's interests with council.
“They can have their own meeting night and come up with ideas like a crime watch or any other community group,” Gobel said.
Jennifer R. Vertullo is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1956, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.