Clairton council approves labor agreements
Clairton council on Tuesday unanimously approved labor agreements with the city's public works and clerical employees, who had been working for five months without formal contracts.
In separate motions, council OK'd the contracts with Teamsters Local 205, retroactive to Jan. 1, pending final approval by city manager Howard Bednar and Solicitor Deron Gabriel. The public works contract extends through Dec. 31, 2016, and the clerical contract goes through Dec. 31, 2017.
Mayor Rich Lattanzi said he's glad to have agreements in place for employees who work tirelessly to make sure city business is done on a daily basis.
“A few years ago, we downscaled our workforce to make it more (financially) feasible for the city. Job consolidation was a part of that,” Lattanzi said. “We as a city appreciate the work of our employees who stepped up to the plate and are able to get the job done. We are proud of all of them.”
Public works operator Eric Fusco, the department's union steward, said the city's staff is happy to be moving forward with a decent, fair contract.
“It was a long process, and we were going on six months without a deal,” he said. “We made a couple concessions, as did the city at the last minute to get it done ... but we will shoot for the things we conceded in the next contract.”
Fusco credited the Teamsters' business agent Ed Baum and secretary/treasurer Carl Bailey for bargaining on behalf of the workers.
Jennifer R. Vertullo is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1956, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.