Glassport officials approve emergency demolitions
Glassport council unanimously approved the emergency demolition of two abandoned buildings along Indiana Avenue immediately following a public hearing on Tuesday evening.
The buildings to be razed are 616 and 620 Indiana Ave., both owned by Glassport resident Ella Sparico.
Neighbors in attendance spoke about the dangers the buildings present, including allegations that they are fire hazards filled with rodents and unmonitored dens for squatters.
Sparico pleaded with council to demolish the structures.
“These buildings are in deplorable conditions,” she said. “They're both ready to come down and I don't have the finances to do anything to fix them.”
Solicitor Gary Matta said the borough engineer inspected the buildings and recommended the emergency demolitions for the “health, safety and welfare of the community.”
Allegheny County will provide $13,000 in Community Development Block Grant funds to dismantle the buildings.
Mayor Rosemary Bradley said demolition will begin once all of the paperwork is submitted to the county.
Council announced the resignation of Councilwoman Nancy Crncic, who was not present at the meeting. Crncic served as chair of the Honor Roll Memorial, municipal buildings and property committees and was vice chair of the sanitation and senior citizen committee. She was a delegate to the Twin Rivers Council of Governments.
Council president David Kowalski said the borough will accept letters through July 4 from anyone interested in potentially being appointed to council. Interviews tentatively are slated to begin July 8.
Tim Karan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1970, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.