Elizabeth Township woman charged with prescription fraud
An Elizabeth Township woman is charged with trying to process counterfeit prescriptions through a White Oak pharmacy.
Bethany Lynn Pope, 32, was arrested by White Oak police on June 13 as she was at the drive-through window of the Giant Eagle pharmacy at Oak Park Mall.
White Oak Chief Lou Bender said Pope was picking up two fraudulent prescriptions for Alprazolam and Hydrocodone, supposedly submitted by a Bridgeville physician.
Alprazolam is known by the trade name Xanax and is used for panic disorders. Hydrocodone is used as a pain medication.
“(Pope) had called in the prescription for a fictitious person the previous day, June 12, after stating that she worked for a physician's office in Bridgeville,” Bender said. “Then she gave the pharmacy the doctor's Drug Enforcement Agency identification number.”
The White Oak chief said Pope formerly worked for that physician.
“Giant Eagle pharmacy employees confirmed that it was a fraudulent prescription after talking to the doctor,” Bender said. “White Oak police then did a follow-up investigation and arrested the woman.”
She was charged with two felony counts of criminal attempt to acquire a controlled substance by misrepresentation, two misdemeanor counts of criminal attempt, two felony counts and two misdemeanor counts of acquiring those substances and one count of identity theft.
Pope is free pending a preliminary hearing on Aug. 4 at 1:30 p.m. before Magisterial District Judge Thomas G. Miller Jr.
Patrick Cloonan is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1967, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.