ShareThis Page

McKeesport man waives case on firearm charges

| Friday, June 20, 2014, 1:41 a.m.

A McKeesport man arrested on weapons charges earlier this month has waived his case to Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas.

Marquise Shepherd, 22, was arrested on June 2 along Brownlee Street after police saw him allegedly throw a firearm over a fence near Building 63 in Crawford Village.

Shepherd, who led police on a foot chase the night of his arrest and was apprehended by a police dog, had his preliminary hearing before Magisterial District Judge Eugene Riazzi in McKeesport this week.

The judge reduced Shepherd's bail from $75,000 to $15,000. Shepherd, who had been jailed since his arrest, posted bail at the reduced amount and was released from Allegheny County Jail on Monday.

Police said the gun they recovered on the night of Shepherd's arrest turned out to be an Omega .22-caliber pistol.

Shepherd is charged with escape, flight to avoid apprehension, carrying a firearm without a license, persons not to possess a firearm, reckless endangerment of another person, tampering with evidence, obstruction of the administration of law, resisting arrest and possession of instruments of crime. Shepherd's formal arraignment is set for Aug. 1.

Eric Slagle is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.