ShareThis Page

East McKeesport, Wall to negotiate police contract

Michael DiVittorio
| Monday, July 14, 2014, 4:51 a.m.

East McKeesport and Wall officials have begun negotiations regarding police protection.

Municipal leaders met on Wednesday to start a new round of discussions regarding East McKeesport police's protection of the nearby borough listed at .48 square miles with 580 people.

East McKeesport police have patrolled Wall since 2004. The current three-year contract expires at the end of the year.

“They're awesome,” Wall council vice president Michael Swidorsky said on Friday. “Anytime we need something they're always in town.”

“They like what we provide them,” East McKeesport councilman John Ekiert said after the monthly council meeting on Thursday. “They want to continue on. Now it's just a matter of going through the steps of getting another agreement together.”

Swidorsky said no formal proposals were disclosed on Wednesday, and did not offer any potential terms.

“Everything comes down to the contract,” Swidorsky said.

“They're going to look at the (current) contract we have and see if they want to tweak it in any way, shape or form,” Ekiert said. “I think (a new agreement) will be before the end of the year for sure.”

Wall annually pays East McKeesport a little more than $35,000 for police service.

East McKeesport Mayor Robert Howard reported police responded to 106 complaints in Wall in June, and spent an average of 8.03 hours per day patrolling the town.

East McKeesport documents state that time did not include the amount spent when officers answered calls for service, “only the amount of time that the officers are required to place on their daily log to ensure that they are providing adequate coverage to the borough of Wall.”

Another negotiation meeting was not scheduled. An agreement may be in place by October or November so the respective municipalities can adopt their budgets in December.

Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1965, or mdivittorio@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.