Mon Valley narcotics probe leads to multiple arrests
Allegheny County police announced 17 felony arrest warrants were obtained in connection with an eight-month narcotics investigation in the Mon Valley.
Suspects reside in McKeesport, White Oak, Glassport, Clairton, Jefferson Hills and the North Side of Pittsburgh, according to a county police news release.
County detectives made numerous buys of heroin and crack cocaine, resulting in the seizure of 5 1⁄2 bricks of heroin, the release stated.
Nine of the 17 suspects were apprehended early on Friday by detectives and officers from the county, McKeesport and White Oak police departments; the other eight remained at-large as of presstime.
White Oak police Chief Lou Bender confirmed his officers' participation in the drug roundup.
“The Allegheny County police do a great job,” Bender said. “They always include the local departments in what they're doing and keep us up to date on the investigation. It's always been a great working relationship with the Allegheny County police.”
Bender could not confirm if any of the suspects arrested on Friday are from White Oak.
McKeesport Capt. of Detectives Tim Hanna said three of the suspects arrested on Friday were in McKeesport, three were outside the city and two were already in Allegheny County Jail on other charges.
McKeesport arrests included one along the 2400 block of Walnut Street, and one in the 1900 block of Grandview Avenue.
Hanna commended the county narcotics unit and city officers.
“We work well with them, and they're always helping out,” Hanna said.
Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1965 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.