ShareThis Page

Money, drugs recovered in West Elizabeth arrest

| Saturday, Aug. 9, 2014, 1:16 a.m.
Submitted
More than $2,500 in cash and 40 packets of heroin were recovered as a result of undercover narcotics operations in West Elizabeth by Elizabeth police.

Elizabeth police arrested two men and recovered money and drugs as part of an undercover operation.

Deon Webb, 18, of West Mifflin and Drake Cheadle, 21, of Clairton were arrested in connection with a heroin sale on Friday around 1:30 p.m. near the intersection of Fifth and Border streets in West Elizabeth.

The arrest is the result of several weeks of surveillance.

“We've had a lot of complaints,” Elizabeth Officer-in-Charge Tim Butler said. “So we had an undercover officer watching the area.”

Butler said the two men had $2,600 and 40 packets of heroin.

They were transported to Allegheny County Jail and charged with conspiracy and delivery of a controlled substance.

“The arrest happened within minutes of the sale,” Butler said.

Police plan to obtain a warrant on Monday to search the vehicle that was used in the drug deal.

Information about the vehicle was not disclosed on Friday.

A preliminary hearing for Webb and Cheadle before Magisterial District Judge Beth Mills has not been scheduled yet.

Staff writer Patrick Cloonan contributed to this story. Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1965, or mdivittorio@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.