ShareThis Page

Lincoln adopts vicious dog ordinance

| Wednesday, Aug. 20, 2014, 2:21 a.m.

Anyone harboring a dangerous dog in Lincoln will have to register it and take other safety measures as part of a new law.

Council on Tuesday unanimously adopted the vicious dog ordinance by a 4-0 vote. Council vice president Kris Beedle was absent.

Council president Mark Betzner said he was unaware of any such animals currently in the borough, and called the ordinance a pre-emptive action.

“If there was any type of an incident of a dog attacking anyone, we now have the capability of going back and declaring it a dangerous dog,” Betzner said. “We now can at least make them get insurance bonds ... Normally we have more problems with (wild animals) than we do domesticated animals.”

“It affords us as law enforcement, as medics and as firefighters to know if a property has a dog that has a history of bite or aggression,” police Chief Richard Bosco said. “It doesn't matter if it's a Labrador, a pit bull or a boxer. If the dog has a history of aggression, and it's documented, then they'll have to register the dog as an aggressive animal. We have none registered at this time.”

According to the ordinance, a vicious dog is any dog that, when unprovoked, inflicts bites on or attacks a person or domestic animal, either on public or private property, or approaches any person in a vicious or terrorizing manner.

The owner must provide proof that they have procured an insurance policy of at least $100,000, covering any damage or injury which may be caused by the dog. The owner must display a sign on their premises warning people that they have a vicious dog, the ordinance reads.

Council accepted the resignation of part-time officers Matthew Bissell and Josh Byers.

Bosco said Bissell served Lincoln for a little more than a year, and is leaving to take a job in North Carolina. Byers served Lincoln for nearly two years. He is leaving because of scheduling conflicts. Byers works as an officer in Port Vue and Liberty.

Council hired William Reed and Stacey Lucas as part-time police officers, pending physical and psychological exams, with a one-year probationary period.

Bosco said Reed is a Clairton officer and a Brentwood Borough School District resource officer, and Lucas worked as a security officer in Ohio and was employed as a civilian with the Ohio sheriff's department.

Lincoln has 10 part-time officers, including these resignations and hirings, and two full-time officers including Bosco.

Michael DiVittorio is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-664-9161, ext. 1965, or mdivittorio@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.