Highmark hopes to submit revised Monroeville plan
Highmark Inc.'s plans for projects in Monroeville and Pine are on hold because of a need for design changes, not its legal battle with West Penn Allegheny Health System, a spokesman said.
Under shell companies, Highmark has submitted site plans to convert a building at 4121 Monroeville Blvd. into an ambulatory surgery center in Monroeville and build a medical mall at 12121 Perry Highway in Pine.
Monroeville Council, which was scheduled to vote after this paper's deadline on a request to withdraw the initial plan, agreed to table a vote last month.
A revised plan will be submitted for the planning commission's review in December, according to a letter to Monroeville from David Mickey, of Downtown-based Astorino, Highmark's architectural firm.
Under the name Optimus 28 Management, Highmark has asked the Pine Planning Commission to table a vote at Monday's meeting, a Pine official said.
As part of Highmark's plan to create a $1 billion health system, it had proposed building medical malls and outpatient centers with help from West Penn.
In September, West Penn dissolved a deal for Highmark to buy the hospital system, claiming that Highmark violated the deal by demanding that West Penn file bankruptcy.
On Friday, an Allegheny County Common Pleas judge granted Highmark's request for a preliminary injunction to prevent West Penn from pursuing other buyers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Rossi: Looking at the next great Steeler
- Steelers swap draft pick for Eagles cornerback
- McCullers’, McLendon’s prowess in clogging trenches crucial to Steelers defense
- Reds solve Cole, stave off Pirates’ 9th-inning rally
- After early criticism, Haley has Steelers offense poised to be even better
- Steelers notebook: Injuries finally become issue at training camp
- Penguins not alone in top-heavy approach to salary cap
- Pirates notebook: New acquisition Happ more than happy to fill spot in rotation
- Shell shovels millions into proposed Beaver County plant site
- Starting 9: Examining Pirates’ deadline decisions
- Roman Catholic Church in midst of culture clash over gays