Developer looks to build in Pitcairn
An Allegheny County housing developer has expressed interest in building three new houses in Pitcairn, at the intersection of Pennsylvania Avenue and School Street.
Tom Wiater, a senior construction manager with Pittsburgh-based Action-Housing Inc., offered to purchase the property, with the intent of building three homes, worth about $200,000 each, property owner Jim Szekely said.
“I thought it was a good idea,” said Szekely, who has owned the property for about 25 years.
Some residents who live near the vacant plot disagree and said they worry that a deal with Action — which offers home development and weatherization for low-income families — could mean low-income residents will move into their neighborhood.
Wiater did not respond to messages seeking comment.
Officials say the property originally was zoned commercial but was rezoned residential in the late 1990s to prevent an adult-entertainment business from moving in to the borough.
A nonprofit organization in Pitcairn headed by Councilman Rollo Vecchio — The East Suburban New Life Development Corp. — is seeking a trust-fund grant to fund the project, officials said.
Vecchio is one of four council members who serve on the board for the nonprofit, but council President John Prucnal said the group held only one meeting when it was first organized about five years ago.
“I'm as much in the dark as the public is and as much as other councilmen are,” Prucnal said. “At this point, there's been no action for council to take.”
Borough officials say they have not been approached with any zoning or building-permit requests.
“This project may never come to fruition,” Pitcairn Solicitor Craig Alexander said.
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.