Export seeks payment for lot
Export officials are hoping to turn an influx of bus riders in the community into a profit.
Since the completion of the Turtle Creek flood-control project last year, commuters regularly are using the borough parking lot as a park-and-ride lot for Westmoreland County Transit Authority. And Export officials want to negotiate a payment from the authority to keep that park-and-ride alive.
“It's great to see that program blossom and succeed,” Mayor Michael Calder said. “But fair is fair. We do need to negotiate a fair price for that use.”
The borough repaved the lot as part of the flood-control project, and it is now used “extensively” by bus riders, Calder said. Ridership on the 2F route, which shuttles Export, Delmont and Murrysville riders to Downtown Pittsburgh, increased by 35 percent in 2012, authority officials said in the fall.
The borough used to receive a monthly payment of about $600 from the transit authority for use of the lot, Councilman John Nagoda said. The lot is advertised as a park-and-ride for the authority and features a bus shelter, he said.
Officials weren't sure when the authority stopped paying for use of the lot, Nagoda said.
“Maybe we can make it exclusively their parking,” Nagoda said. “I think it's a good idea.”
Officials at the Westmoreland County Transit Authority did not respond to requests for comment.
Daveen Rae Kurutz is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8627, or email@example.com.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.