Pay-to-play policy could be on horizon at Gateway
By Kyle Lawson
Published: Wednesday, March 20, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Gateway students might have to pay to participate in extracurricular activities next school year.
While some school board directors advocated Monday for the public release of a proposed pay-to-play policy, others cautioned that it's too soon.
The proposed policy would apply to middle and high school activities such as athletic teams and marching band. A high school student would pay a maximum of $100 per sport, and the fee for one student would not exceed $275, school Director Bob Elms said.
The administrative policy should be made available to the public next week, school director Skip Drumheller said.
“We need to do these things out in public so people can see them and respond,” Drumheller said.
The school board is scheduled to vote Wednesday on releasing the first draft for a 30-day public review.
Members of the policy committee said Monday that they had yet to see or discuss the policy.
Committee members Janice Rawson and Jim Capell said the school board should wait until members have decided that a pay-to-play program is necessary to fund activities before releasing a policy.
Committee member Dave Magill said the proposed costs are unfair to lower-income families.
“It's got to be fair,” Magill said. “I didn't see where the lower-income people are being helped.”
School director Dan Nowak agreed that the discussion of the pay-to-play issue should start now, so school directors aren't grasping for budget solutions at the last minute — similar to what happened last year, he said.
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.