Police seize 35 bricks of heroin in Monroeville bust
A drug bust by local and Pennsylvania State Police this month at the Cambridge Square Apartments in Monroeville yielded nearly 35 bricks of heroin, worth an estimated $15,750.
Six people were arrested March 8 when police seized the heroin, two stolen guns and a quarter-ounce of crack cocaine, according to a criminal complaint. The heroin was packaged with the label “Freedom.”
Police charged five men, ranging in age from 18 to 27, with home addresses from various areas, including Glassport and Plum.
The apartment was rented to Krysten L. Sadler, 25, of Monroeville who told police it was being used by the co-defendants to sell narcotics, according to the complaint.
State police charged Deandre K. Smith, 18, of Verona Street in Braddock; Cordero A. Hogan, 26, of East Murray Court in Plum; James G. Swanson, 25, of Erie Street in Glassport; Jared Harris, 19, of Calumet Street in Swissvale and Sadler of Cambridge Square Drive in Monroeville with possession with intent to deliver, use or possession with intent to use drug paraphernalia and criminal conspiracy.
Police also charged Joseph A. Jones, 27, of Sunnyside Avenue in East Pittsburgh with conspiracy.
Smith, Hogan, Swanson and Harris also are facing two counts of receiving stolen property in connection with the two firearms, one of which police traced to a “known victim” from McKeesport, according to the criminal complaint.
Monroeville police Chief Steve Pascarella did not return phone calls seeking comment on the arrests.
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.