Pitcairn candidate bumped from ballot; Wilson withstands challenge
A would-be candidate for Pitcairn Council was removed from the ballot last week after missing a filing deadline by one day. Meanwhile, a Monroeville Council candidate will appear on the ballot if he submits more details about his finances.
Council hopeful James Rullo, a Democrat, filed his statement of financial interest with the Allegheny County Division of Elections on time as part of the process to be on the May 21 primary ballot. But he missed the deadline to file with the borough.
Rullo said he is new to politics and was unaware of the borough deadline to file the statement of financial interest. An official with the county elections division said that Allegheny County Common Pleas Court Judge Joseph James had no choice but to remove Rullo from the ballot, based on precedent that classifies a missed deadline as a “fatal defect.”
Four seats are open on Pitcairn Council, and there now are seven candidates. Rullo's petition was challenged by incumbent Rollo Vecchio, a Democrat and a veteran of Pitcairn politics.
Monroeville Council candidate Tom Wilson, also a Democrat, will remain on the primary ballot, assuming he provides the necessary amendments to his financial-interest statement, according to an official with the county elections division.
Wilson said he unintentionally left out a few details, such as his seat on the municipal personnel board. He said he will resign from that board if he is elected. Wilson was challenged by Monroeville resident Carolyn Ramsey, a Democrat who is campaigning against Wilson for the Ward 7 party nomination.
Meanwhile, Monroeville resident Frank Amato, a Republican, has announced his plans to run as a write-in candidate in Ward 1. There are no Republicans on the ballot for the Ward 1 nomination.
The top vote-getters in the primary will advance to the general election in November.
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.