Gateway teacher contract negotiations continue
Gateway teachers are negotiating a new contract with the school district as a five-year contract comes to an end.
The details of personnel negotiations are not open to the public, but Gateway Teachers Association President Chuck Riley released a statement this week that — although it doesn't indicate if negotiations are going well or not— affirms that regular negotiations are taking place.
“I cannot predict what will happen in the new contract,” Riley wrote.
“We began negotiations in January. We are meeting to negotiate on a regular basis.”
Last year, Gateway teachers accepted a 1-percent salary reduction for the current school year, representing a savings of about $230,000.
The union also agreed to forgo hourly wages for administering to classrooms in lieu of a substitute teacher, representing more than $50,000 in savings.
Those concessions enabled the district to reinstate four teaching positions for the current school year, school board President Steve O'Donnell said.
“I know that the teachers are committed to the students, and the (school) board is committed to the students,” O'Donnell said.
Gateway Superintendent Nina Zetty and personnel director Bob Reger are negotiating directly with the teachers union, while school directors have provided some direction to district administrators, O'Donnell said.
The current Collective Bargaining Agreement expires at midnight Aug. 25, Reger said.
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.