Officials confident in temporary Pitcairn bridge until funding comes
A fold-up bridge will suffice until funding is available to repair the Eleanor Street Bridge, Pitcairn officials said.
A temporary bridge that was installed on top of the Eleanor Street Bridge cost the municipality about $27,000, in addition to about $2,000 for the paved ramps on both sides, officials said.
The bridge was installed two weeks ago.
“I was there to watch the unloading of the bridge and went back after the ramps were there to watch the traffic go over the bridge, and I have no concerns,” said Pitcairn engineer Don Black at the April 23 council meeting.
Repairing the bridge is estimated to cost about $360,000, which might be available through Allegheny County, though it is uncertain if, or when, the funding will be available, said council President John Prucnal, who lives on Eleanor Street.
“We have no idea what (funding) they'll give us,” Prucnal said. “That's the whole problem.”
The bridge carries local traffic to small, residential area.
PennDOT officials said the bridge is too short to meet funding requirements, and a letter that borough officials sent to state Sen. Jim Brewster (D-McKeesport) has yet to yield any state funding, Prucnal said.
Local officials closed the bridge about a month ago, citing safety concerns.
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.