Man accused of injuring detective outside Monroeville Mall in March caught
Monroeville police tracked down a man suspected of dealing heroin who is accused of injuring a detective outside of the Monroeville Mall two months ago.
Dior L. Richardson, 25, of Bramble Street in Verona, faces charges that include aggravated assault, possession with intent to deliver heroin, illegally possessing a firearm, resisting arrest and fleeing from a police officer.
While conducting surveillance March 15 near Burlington Coat Factory in the Monroeville Mall Annex, Monroeville Detective Jon Pawlowski saw what appeared to be a drug exchange in a Chevy Impala between Richardson and an unidentified woman in her 20s, according to the criminal complaint.
According to the criminal complaint, as Pawlowski approached the vehicle, Richardson reached for his pants, instead of showing his hands as instructed.
Pawlowski then discharged his stun device, which struck Richardson.
Pawlowski reached through the driver side window to grab him, but Richardson pressed on the gas and spun Pawlowski to the pavement, according to the complaint.
Pawlowski has a back injury that “continues to require medical treatment,” police said.
Police recovered a semiautomatic hand gun with 10 live rounds and 80 glassine bags of heroin in locations consistent with the items being tossed out of the fleeing vehicle, according to the criminal complaint.
Using the license plate number of the Impala and a photo lineup, police were able to track down and arrest Richardson.
The preliminary hearing is scheduled for Tuesday in Monroeville.
Kyle Lawson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8755, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.